大发彩票官网|大发彩票代理

来源：大发彩票论坛2024-04-07 17:48

大发彩票官网

新时代新征程新伟业丨用新题材唐卡讲好西藏发展故事******

　　新华社拉萨12月22日电题：用新题材唐卡讲好西藏发展故事

　　新华社记者春拉

　　冬日的早晨，西藏自治区日喀则市非物质文化遗产展示中心的画室内，43岁的西落正仔细端详着眼前的画作——画布上，远处白雪覆盖的珠穆朗玛峰与近处的绿水青山相辉映，花果丰饶的山水间，藏羚羊、梅花鹿等嬉戏奔跑，一派生机盎然的高原景象……

　　“我现在画的是‘珠峰起源’，是日喀则大型新题材唐卡创作——‘百匠唐卡·千米画卷’组图的一部分。”西落介绍，这组新题材唐卡作品长848.43米，宽2.5米，力求生动呈现跨越千年的高原变迁，表现西藏人民坚韧不拔、感恩向上、敢为人先的精神风貌。

　　这位西藏勉萨画派非遗传承人，两个月来，和他的学生们埋头于唐卡“珠峰起源”的绘制。他们熟练运用度量、勾线、填色、描金、开眼等手法，在画卷中真实展现藏族人民的生活巨变，展示传承千年的西藏唐卡绘画技艺。

　　西落说，在党的二十大精神指引下，艺术百花齐放、与时俱进，传统唐卡画师和受众将更多得到探索多元表达的珍贵机会与体验，中华多元一体文化的感召力与凝聚力将进一步增强。

　　日喀则市文化局党组书记普次仁说，党的二十大报告指出，坚持以人民为中心的创作导向，推出更多增强人民精神力量的优秀作品。这对文化工作者来说，是极大的激励。这些年，日喀则市以保护传承唐卡文化、发展壮大唐卡产业为目标，创作了一批不失传统色彩、紧扣时代主题，融合观赏性、艺术性、思想性的新时代优秀唐卡作品。

　　“百幅新题材唐卡创作与展览 ”就是一次全新的尝试。普次仁介绍，该创新项目于2019年启动，首批近50幅作品由37名本地老中青三代唐卡画师参与创作，历时两年完成。

　　《川藏公路》《草原新象》《团结抱紧》……一幅幅新题材唐卡展陈于非遗展示中心内，“古老”的唐卡多了现代气息，观众在熟悉的传统艺术中感受到时代的步履、家乡的巨变。

　　其中，《团结抱紧》就是西落的作品。

　　“这幅唐卡中，在盛满五谷，寓意吉祥如意的切玛和青稞酒桌前，身着民族特色服饰的人们围着篝火欢快地跳着锅庄，56个民族亲如一家，大家团结抱紧、生活红火、幸福安康。”西落说。

　　另一幅作品《庄重歌舞》则出自西落的学生普穷之手。画作中，扶老携幼的藏族百姓正与国内外游人一道，沉浸在西藏国家级非物质文化遗产代表性项目“谐钦”歌舞表演中；远处，政府兴建的安居工程错落有致。

　　“我想表达这样的主题：在国家的大好政策下，西藏百姓安居乐业，优秀传统文化得到全面保护、传承与弘扬。”普穷说。

　　记者了解到，目前日喀则市唐卡画师已超过千人，全市唐卡年产值超过2000万元；全市国家级和自治区级非遗代表性名录项目合计达95项、代表性传承人77名。

　　“接下来，我们要以党的二十大精神为引领，更好开展高质量非物质文化遗产传承与创新工作，进一步激发文化创新创造活力，力争通过更多优秀作品讲好中国西藏故事。”普次仁说。

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.